Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

	Introduction:	Scientific Approach \| Need for a Belief \| Creator's Existence \| Prophecy (Message)
	What is Islam:	Basics of Islam \| Women in Islam \| War in Islam \| Politics in Islam \| Muslims & World
	Terrorism Issues:	Sept. Attack & Who's behind it? \| Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
	Nations:	Europe Between Technology & Spiritualism

Before 1948, there wasn’t something that called Israel. Great Britain had given Some Jewish groups (Non-Palestinian Jews) in that period the right to establish a country in Palestine!! Arabs and Muslims weren’t able then to defend this country, i.e., Palestine. So, Those Jewish groups could establish a country called Israel.

I wonder how could for Great Britain to give such right for those groups to occupy a land they don’t own. Great Britain, also, doesn’t own this land to offer it for others.

Now, these Jewish groups (Israeli people) claim this land, i.e. Palestine, depending on many points of view. They said that they have lived on this land a few years about many thousands of years ago!!! But depending on such point, we can draw these matters:

- Italy had lived for many years over Libya. Does this mean that Libya is an Italian land?!

- Spain, UK, France, or Portugal… had lived for many years over North America. Does it mean that USA is a Spanish, British, or French land?!

Israel, also, said that they have many religious aspects on Palestine!! Depending on this, Palestine has many many of Christian religious aspects. So, Vatican (in Italy) has the priority over Israel in controlling Palestine!!!

It’s a simple fact. If you live in a house (that you own), then someone (a stranger) came to your house and said that this house belongs to him/her. Would you let this stranger takes your house?! Or would you let them take the half or the quarter of your house?!!!

Remember that there is a deference between Terrorism and Resistance. Terrorism is to fight without right; or to assault (or to take without any right) someone else rights. While Resistance it to fight those who take your rights. Based on the previous discussion, we do believe that Palestinians are resistants. And, resistance is right. While Israelis are terrorists. And, terrorism is rejected.

Now, let's talk about Human Bomb. Western world (in general) are always talking about two terms (when they talk about this conflict): Bombs and Suicides. If you are against Suicides, then we and you can make a law over the whole world to convict the suicides whenever it happens. But since that western world don't do so, that means they are not against suicides. Actually they are against bombs. It's not matter the name of the second term. The matter is the killing; wither such killing was by a normal bomb or by a human bomb.

From a neutral view, we can say that there are two conflicting parties: Israelis and Palestinians. Both have a bomb in their hands and wanted to kill each other. The first party wanted to kill the second party. So, it searched for a way to through this bomb on the second party. The first party found an Air Fighter, Tank, or a Missile. It used these things to through the bomb on the second party. While the second party searched for a Fighter, Tank, or a Missile to through the bomb but it didn't find any of these things. So, the second party hold the bomb in its hand and blew it in its hand on the first party. The result is one. And, if we are going to say that one party is on the wrong side (to convict one party), we can't say but that both parties are on the wrong side (convicted). Yet, the first party has an army, has weapons, and is occupying the second party's land. While the second party has no army, has no weapons (like the first one), and its land is occupied by the first party. The first party is the one who starts... while the second party is the one who follows... The actions of the second party is a result for the actions of the first party. The actions of the first party is the reason. And, those who ask for peace should always deal with the reason not with the result. You can say: "we're looking for peace", "we don't agree with terrorism", "we don't agree with violence",...etc. But talking alone won't lead for peace. You should deal with the reason not with the result to reach the peace. A simple example, if a parent of a Palestinian kid were killed by an Israeli Missile, will this kid think of studying or think of world prosperity matters?!! No, s/he will think only of how to be a human bomb that take revenge of Israel!